심리학의 원리/심리학의 원리2
심리학의 원리/심리학의 원리2
Blog Article
What almost certainly remains true, even so, is that almost all Guys Have a very fewer auditory and a more articulatory verbal creativity than They are really apt to be aware of. The experiment proves how dependent our verbal imagination is on real emotions in lips, tongue, throat, larynx, and so on. The frequently-acquired thought is that it is just a milder diploma of the same procedure which happened when the thing now imagined was sensibly perceived. Trust me, who For lots of a thousand calendar year Exactly the same tough meat have chewed and examined, That from the cradle on the bier No guy the ancient leaven has digested! In favor of your sensationalistic or nativistic look at of one such case, see the important paper by Von Kries, Archiv file. After we arrive to review hallucinations in the chapter on Outer Perception, we shall see this is under no circumstances a factor of exceptional occurrence. A man blind of his visual Mind-centres can no much more see darkness out of the areas of his retina which are connected With all the brain-lesion than he can see it out on the pores and skin of his back again.
The most vivid touch-images come when we ourselves barely escape local injury, or when we see another injured. It would seem that in such a case the neural process corresponding to the imagination must be the entire tract concerned in the actual sensation, even down as far as the retina. Life somewhat better might content him, But for the gleam of heavenly light which Thou hast lent him: He calls it Reason--thence his power's increased, To be far beastlier than any beast. So far as I know there is only one other published report of a similar experience. Enter not so stall-fed quite, Like elephant-calves about one! A few monographs by competent observers, like Stricker, about their own peculiarities, would give much more valuable information about the diversities which prevail. Moreover there are no facts which oblige us to think that, within the occipital cortex, one part is connected with sensation and another with mere ideation or imagination. To most people the image is at first 'thick,' as the sound of the word would be if they tried to pronounce it with the lips parted. So of a baby crying in a distant part of the house, we are uncertain whether we still hear it, or only imagine the sound.
A good way of bringing The problem to consciousness is the fact that proposed by Stricker: Partly open up your mouth after which you can picture any word with labials or dentals in it, for example 'bubble, 'toddle.' Is your impression underneath these disorders distinctive? The actions of articulate speech Enjoy a predominant aspect in his psychological lifetime. I will Participate in the comedy with art. The enigmatic studies of the impact of magnets and metals, even whenever they be thanks, as several contend, to unintentional suggestion over the operator's component, surely require hyperæsthetic perception, to the operator seeks at the same time as feasible to hide the moment in the event the magnet is introduced into Enjoy, and nonetheless the topic not simply finds it out that minute in a means difficult to understand, but may develop consequences which (in the main occasion surely) the operator did not look forward to finding. The boy actively playing 'I spy,' the legal skulking from his pursuers, the superstitious individual hurrying from the woods or earlier the churchyard at midnight, the man misplaced during the woods, the girl who tremulously has designed an night appointment along with her swain, all are topic to illusions of sight and audio which make their hearts conquer until they are dispelled.
THE NEURAL PROCESS WHICH UNDERLIES IMAGINATION? This is inexplicable if the imagination be simply a weaker excitement of the sensational process. The truth seems to be that the cases where peripheral sense-organs are directly excited in consequence of imagination are exceptional rarities, if they exist at all. In persons whose auditory imagination is weak, the articulatory image seems to constitute the whole material for verbal thought. What you have no idea of you cannot miss; and their not definitely missing this great region out of their sight seems due to the fact that their very idea and memory of it is lost along with the sensation. A statistical inquiry on a large scale, into the variations of acoustic, tactile, and motor imagination, would probably bear less fruit than Galton's inquiry into visual images. Now we know that currents usually flow one way in the nervous system; and for the peripheral sense-organs to be excited in these cases, the current would have to flow backward. Were there centres for crude optical sensation below the cortex, the patients in these cases would still feel light and darkness.